[ad_1]
Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, Okay. et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic mobile complexity. Nature 541, 353–358 (2017).
Liu, Y. et al. Expanded range of Asgard archaea and their relationships with eukaryotes. Nature 593, 553–557 (2021).
Eme, L., Spang, A., Lombard, J., Stairs, C. W. & Ettema, T. J. G. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 711–723 (2017).
Stairs, C. W. & Ettema, T. J. G. The archaeal roots of the eukaryotic dynamic actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Biol. 30, R521–R526 (2020).
Akıl, C. et al. Legendary origins of the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 68, 55–63 (2021).
Nobs, S. J., MacLeod, F. I., Wong, H. L. & Burns, B. P. Eukarya the chimera: eukaryotes, a secondary innovation of the 2 domains of life? Traits Microbiol. 30, 421–431 (2022).
Imachi, H. et al. Isolation of an archaeon on the prokaryote-eukaryote interface. Nature 577, 519–525 (2020).
Huet, J., Schnabel, R., Sentenac, A. & Zillig, W. Archaebacteria and eukaryotes possess DNA-dependent RNA polymerases of a standard sort. EMBO J. 2, 1291–1294 (1983).
Iwabe, N., Kuma, Okay., Hasegawa, M., Osawa, S. & Miytata, T. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic bushes of duplicated genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 9355–9359 (1989).
Spang, A. et al. Complicated archaea that bridge the hole between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature 521, 173–179 (2015).
Solar, J. et al. Recoding of cease codons expands the metabolic potential of two novel Asgardarchaeota lineages. ISME Commun. 1, 30 (2021).
Seitz, Okay. W., Lazar, C. S., Hinrichs, Okay. U., Teske, A. P. & Baker, B. J. Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur discount. ISME J. 10, 1696–1705 (2016).
Seitz, Okay. W. et al. Asgard archaea able to anaerobic hydrocarbon biking. Nat. Commun. 10, 1822 (2019).
Cai, M. et al. Various Asgard archaea together with the novel phylum Gerdarchaeota take part in natural matter degradation. Sci. China Life Sci. 63, 886–897 (2020).
Farag, I. F., Zhao, R. & Biddle, J. F. “Sifarchaeota,” a novel Asgard phylum from Costa Rican sediment able to polysaccharide degradation and anaerobic methylotrophy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e02584-20 (2021).
Zhang, J. W. et al. Newly found Asgard archaea Hermodarchaeota doubtlessly degrade alkanes and aromatics by way of alkyl/benzyl-succinate synthase and benzoyl-CoA pathway. ISME J. 15, 1826–1843 (2021).
Xie, R. et al. Increasing Asgard members within the area of Archaea sheds new mild on the origin of eukaryotes. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 818–829 (2022).
Bulzu, P.-A. et al. Casting mild on Asgardarchaeota metabolism in a sunlit microoxic area of interest. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1129–1137 (2019).
Akıl, C. et al. Insights into the evolution of regulated actin dynamics by way of characterization of primitive gelsolin/cofilin proteins from Asgard archaea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19904–19913 (2020).
Lu, Z. et al. Coevolution of eukaryote-like Vps4 and ESCRT-III subunits within the Asgard archaea. Ecol. Evol. Sci. 11, e00417-20 (2020).
Hatano, T. et al. Asgard archaea make clear the evolutionary origins of the eukaryotic ubiquitin-ESCRT equipment. Nat. Commun. 13, 3398 (2022).
Ettema, T. J. G., Lindås, A. C. & Bernander, R. An actin-based cytoskeleton in archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 1052–1061 (2011).
Izoré, T., Kureisaite-Ciziene, D., McLaughlin, S. H. & Löwe, J. Crenactin varieties actin-like double helical filaments regulated by arcadin-2. eLife 5, e21600 (2016).
Akıl, C. & Robinson, R. C. Genomes of Asgard archaea encode profilins that regulate actin. Nature 562, 439–443 (2018).
Survery, S. et al. Heimdallarchaea encodes profilin with eukaryotic-like actin regulation and polyproline binding. Commun. Biol. 4, 1024 (2021).
Inturi, R., Lara, S., Derweesh, M. & Chi, C. N. Structural characterization of a Thorarchaeota profilin signifies eukaryotic-like options however with an prolonged N-terminus. Adv. Biol. 6, e2101323 (2022).
Schleper, C. & Sousa, F. L. Meet the kin of our mobile ancestor. Nature 577, 478–479 (2020).
Baum, D. A. & Baum, B. An inside-out origin for the eukaryotic cell. BMC Biol. 12, 76 (2014).
Manoharan, L. et al. Metagenomes from coastal marine sediments give insights into the ecological function and mobile options of Loki– and Thorarchaeota. mBio 10, e02039-19 (2019).
Cai, M. et al. Ecological options and international distribution of Asgard archaea. Sci. Complete Environ. 758, 143581 (2021).
Wu, F. et al. Distinctive cell parts and scalable gene circulation on the prokaryote–eukaryote boundary revealed by circularized Asgard archaea genomes. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 200–212 (2022).
Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M. & Schmidt, T. M. rRNA operon copy quantity displays ecological methods of micro organism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1328–1333 (2000).
Curler, B. R. Okay., Stoddard, S. F. & Schmidt, T. M. Exploiting rRNA operon copy quantity to analyze bacterial reproductive methods. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16160 (2016).
Luo, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M. & Konstantinidis, Okay. T. MyTaxa: a complicated taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e73 (2014).
Konstantinidis, Okay. T., Rosselló-Móra, R. & Amann, R. Uncultivated microbes in want of their very own taxonomy. ISME J. 11, 2399–2406 (2017).
Penev, P. I. et al. Supersized ribosomal RNA enlargement segments in asgard archaea. Genome Biol. Evol. 12, 1694–1710 (2020).
Rosenshine, I., Tchelet, R. & Mevarech, M. The mechanism of DNA switch within the mating system of an archaebacterium. Science 245, 1387–1389 (1989).
Nickell, S., Hegerl, R., Baumeister, W. & Rachel, R. Pyrodictium cannulae enter the periplasmic house however don’t enter the cytoplasm, as revealed by cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 141, 34–42 (2003).
Sivabalasarma, S. et al. Evaluation of Cell–Cell Bridges in Haloferax volcanii utilizing electron cryo-tomography reveal a steady cytoplasm and S-layer. Entrance. Microbiol. 11, 612239 (2021).
Marguet, E. et al. Membrane vesicles, nanopods and/or nanotubes produced by hyperthermophilic archaea of the genus Thermococcus. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 436–442 (2013).
Von Der Ecken, J. et al. Construction of the F-actin-tropomyosin complicated. Nature 519, 114–117 (2015).
Yutin, N., Wolf, M. Y., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. The origins of phagocytosis and eukaryogenesis. Biol. Direct 4, 9 (2009).
Bernander, R., Lind, A. E. & Ettema, T. J. G. An archaeal origin for the actin cytoskeleton: implications for eukaryogenesis. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 664–667 (2011).
Van den Ent, F., Amos, L. A. & Löwe, J. Prokaryotic origin of the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 413, 39–44 (2001).
Pollard, T. D. & Cooper, J. A. Actin, a central participant in cell form and motion. Science 326, 1208–1212 (2009).
Yin, X. et al. Subgroup degree variations of physiological actions in marine Lokiarchaeota. ISME J. 15, 848–861 (2021).
Jørgensen, S. L., Thorseth, I. H., Pedersen, R. B., Baumberger, T. & Schleper, C. Quantitative and phylogenetic examine of the deep sea archaeal group in sediments of the arctic mid-ocean spreading ridge. Entrance. Microbiol. 4, 299 (2013).
Jorgensen, S. L. et al. Correlating microbial neighborhood profiles with geochemical information in extremely stratified sediments from the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2846–E2855 (2012).
Moreira, D. & López-García, P. Symbiosis between methanogenic archaea and δ-proteobacteria because the origin of eukaryotes: the syntrophic speculation. J. Mol. Evol. 47, 517–530 (1998).
Martin, W. & Müller, M. The hydrogen speculation for the primary eukaryote. Nature 392, 37–41 (1998).
López-García, P. & Moreira, D. Eukaryogenesis, a syntrophy affair. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1068–1070 (2019).
Spang, A. et al. Proposal of the reverse circulation mannequin for the origin of the eukaryotic cell primarily based on comparative analyses of Asgard archaeal metabolism. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1138–1148 (2019).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the standard of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Ludwig, W. et al. ARB: a software program surroundings for sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. World patterns of 16S rRNA range at a depth of hundreds of thousands of sequences per pattern. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome information science utilizing QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90 (2018).
Amann, R. I., Krumholz, L. & Stahl, D. A. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of complete cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental research in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172, 762–770 (1990).
Raskin, L., Stromley, J. M., Rittmann, B. E. & Stahl, D. A. Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to explain pure communities of methanogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 1232–1240 (1994).
Yamaguchi, T. et al. In situ DNA-hybridization chain response (HCR): a facilitated in situ HCR system for the detection of environmental microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 2532–2541 (2015).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, Okay. W. NIH Picture to ImageJ: 25 years of picture evaluation. Nat. Strategies 9, 671–675 (2012).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a versatile trimmer for Illumina sequence information. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A. & Korobeynikov, A. Utilizing SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 70, e102 (2020).
Graham, E. D., Heidelberg, J. F. & Tully, B. J. Binsanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies utilizing protection and affinity propagation. PeerJ 5, e3035 (2017).
Wu, Y. W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automatic binning algorithm to recuperate genomes from a number of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 605–607 (2016).
Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an environment friendly device for precisely reconstructing single genomes from complicated microbial communities. PeerJ 3, 31165 (2015).
Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by protection and composition. Nat. Strategies 11, 1144–1146 (2014).
Sieber, C. M. Okay. et al. Restoration of genomes from metagenomes by way of a dereplication, aggregation and scoring technique. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 836–843 (2018).
Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to categorise genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L. & Holt, Okay. E. Finishing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb. Genom. 3, e000132 (2017).
De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D. T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing information. Bioinformatics 34, 2666–2669 (2018).
Kolmogorov, M. et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome meeting utilizing repeat graphs. Nat. Strategies 17, 1103–1110 (2020).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
Quinlan, A. R. & Corridor, I. M. BEDTools: a versatile suite of utilities for evaluating genomic options. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Shen, W., Le, S., Li, Y. & Hu, F. SeqKit: a cross-platform and ultrafast toolkit for FASTA/Q file manipulation. PLoS ONE 11, e0163962 (2016).
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Meeting of lengthy, error-prone reads utilizing repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an built-in device for complete microbial variant detection and genome meeting enchancment. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
Giguere, D. J. et al. Full and validated genomes from a metagenome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.08.032540 (2020).
Seemann, T. Prokka: fast prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Katoh, Okay. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT a number of sequence alignment software program model 7: enhancements in efficiency and usefulness. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a brand new software program for choice of phylogenetic informative areas from a number of sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010).
Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new fashions and environment friendly strategies for phylogenetic inference within the genomic period. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).
Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: enhancing the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).
Mistry, J. et al. Pfam: the protein households database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D412–D419 (2021).
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, Okay. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG instruments for purposeful characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 726–731 (2016).
Xie, Z. & Tang, H. ISEScan: automated identification of insertion sequence parts in prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 33, 3340–3347 (2017).
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog teams for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2189 (2003).
Farrer, R. A. Synima: a synteny imaging device for annotated genome assemblies. BMC Bioinform. 18, 507 (2017).
Haas, B. J., Delcher, A. L., Wortman, J. R. & Salzberg, S. L. DAGchainer: a device for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics 20, 3643–3646 (2004).
Hao, Z. et al. RIdeogram: drawing SVG graphics to visualise and map genome-wide information on the idiograms. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e251 (2020).
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing information. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).
Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a device for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. Okay. F., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: quick mannequin choice for correct phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Strategies 14, 587–589 (2017).
Brameyer, S. et al. Outer membrane vesicles facilitate trafficking of the hydrophobic signaling molecule CAI-1 between Vibrio harveyi cells. J. Bacteriol. 200, e00740-17 (2018).
Flechsler, J. et al. 2D and 3D immunogold localization on (epoxy) ultrathin sections with and with out osmium tetroxide. Microsc. Res. Tech. 83, 691–705 (2020).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image evaluation. Nat. Strategies 9, 676–682 (2012).
Weiss, G. L., Medeiros, J. M. & Pilhofer, M. in Bacterial Protein Secretion Techniques (eds Journet, L. & Cascales, E.) 353–375 (Humana Press, 2017).
Tivol, W. F., Briegel, A. & Jensen, G. J. An improved cryogen for plunge freezing. Microsc. Microanal. 14, 375–379 (2008).
Iancu, C. V. et al. Electron cryotomography pattern preparation utilizing the Vitrobot. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2813–2819 (2007).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography utilizing sturdy prediction of specimen actions. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Schorb, M., Haberbosch, I., Hagen, W. J. H., Schwab, Y. & Mastronarde, D. N. Software program instruments for automated transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Strategies 16, 471–477 (2019).
Hagen, W. J. H., Wan, W. & Briggs, J. A. G. Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for top decision subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017).
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Pc visualization of three-dimensional picture information utilizing IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Liu, Y.-T. et al. Isotropic reconstruction for electron tomography with deep studying. Nat. Commun. 13, 6482 (2022).
Hylton, R. Okay., Heebner, J. E., Grillo, M. A. & Swulius, M. T. Cofilactin filaments regulate filopodial construction and dynamics in neuronal development cones. Nat. Commun. 13, 2439 (2022).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: construction visualization for researchers, educators, and builders. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Zivanov, J. et al. A Bayesian strategy to single-particle electron cryo-tomography in RELION-4.0. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.28.482229 (2022).
Castaño-Díez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a versatile, user-friendly growth device for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM information in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012).
Sas-Chen, A. et al. Dynamic RNA acetylation revealed by quantitative cross-evolutionary mapping. Nature 583, 638–643 (2020).
Sweeney, B. A. et al. R2DT is a framework for predicting and visualising RNA secondary construction utilizing templates. Nat. Commun. 12, 3494 (2021).
Martins, B. et al. Unveiling the polarity of actin filaments by cryo-electron tomography. Construction 29, 488–498 (2021).
Wang, Z. et al. The molecular foundation for sarcomere group in vertebrate skeletal muscle. Cell 184, 2135–2150 (2021).
He, S. & Scheres, S. H. W. Helical reconstruction in RELION. J. Struct. Biol. 198, 163–176 (2017).
[ad_2]
