Schlager, M. A., Hoang, H. T., Urnavicius, L., Bullock, S. L. & Carter, A. P. In vitro reconstitution of a extremely processive recombinant human dynein complicated. EMBO J. 33, 1855–1868 (2014).
McKenney, R. J., Huynh, W., Tanenbaum, M. E., Bhabha, G. & Vale, R. D. Activation of cytoplasmic dynein motility by dynactin–cargo adapter complexes. Science 345, 337–341 (2014).
Splinter, D. et al. BICD2, dynactin, and LIS1 cooperate in regulating dynein recruitment to mobile constructions. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 4226–4241 (2012).
Urnavicius, L. et al. Cryo-EM exhibits how dynactin recruits two dyneins for quicker motion. Nature 554, 202–206 (2018).
Grotjahn, D. A. et al. Cryo-electron tomography reveals that dynactin recruits a group of dyneins for processive motility. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 203–207 (2018).
Elshenawy, M. M. et al. Cargo adaptors regulate stepping and drive technology of mammalian dynein–dynactin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1093–1101 (2019).
Reck-Peterson, S. L., Redwine, W. B., Vale, R. D. & Carter, A. P. The cytoplasmic dynein transport equipment and its many cargoes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 382–398 (2018).
Olenick, M. A. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Dynein activators and adaptors at a look. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs227132 (2019).
Lee, I.-G. et al. A conserved interplay of the dynein mild intermediate chain with dynein–dynactin effectors obligatory for processivity. Nat. Commun. 9, 986 (2018).
Sacristan, C. et al. Dynamic kinetochore measurement regulation promotes microtubule seize and chromosome biorientation in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 800–810 (2018).
Celestino, R. et al. A transient helix within the disordered area of dynein mild intermediate chain hyperlinks the motor to structurally various adaptors for cargo transport. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000100 (2019).
Gama, J. B. et al. Molecular mechanism of dynein recruitment to kinetochores by the Rod–Zw10–Zwilch complicated and Spindly. J. Cell Biol. 216, 943–960 (2017).
Lau, C. Ok. et al. Cryo-EM reveals the complicated structure of dynactin’s shoulder area and pointed finish. EMBO J. 40, e106164 (2021).
Roberts, A. J. et al. AAA+ ring and linker swing mechanism within the dynein motor. Cell 136, 485–495 (2009).
Bhabha, G. et al. Allosteric communication within the dynein motor area. Cell 159, 857–868 (2014).
DeWitt, M. A., Cypranowska, C. A., Cleary, F. B., Belyy, V. & Yildiz, A. The AAA3 area of cytoplasmic dynein acts as a swap to facilitate microtubule launch. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 73–80 (2015).
Nicholas, M. P. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein regulates its attachment to microtubules through nucleotide state-switched mechanosensing at a number of AAA domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6371–6376 (2015).
Goldtzvik, Y., Mugnai, M. L. & Thirumalai, D. Dynamics of allosteric transitions in dynein. Construction 26, 1664–1677.e5 (2018).
Urnavicius, L. et al. The construction of the dynactin complicated and its interplay with dynein. Science 347, 1441–1446 (2015).
Elshenawy, M. M. et al. Lis1 prompts dynein motility by modulating its pairing with dynactin. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 570–578 (2020).
Htet, Z. M. et al. LIS1 promotes the formation of activated cytoplasmic dynein-1 complexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 518–525 (2020).
Lee, I.-G., Cason, S. E., Alqassim, S. S., Holzbaur, E. L. F. & Dominguez, R. A tunable LIC1–adaptor interplay modulates dynein exercise in a cargo-specific method. Nat. Commun. 11, 5695 (2020).
Ma, M. et al. Construction of the embellished ciliary doublet microtubule. Cell 179, 909–922.e12 (2019).
Walton, T., Wu, H. & Brown, A. Construction of a microtubule-bound axonemal dynein. Nat. Commun. 12, 477 (2021).
Kubo, S. et al. Transforming and activation mechanisms of outer arm dyneins revealed by cryo-EM. EMBO Rep. 22, e52911 (2021).
Rao, Q. et al. Constructions of outer-arm dynein array on microtubule doublet reveal a motor coordination mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 799–810 (2021).
Cook dinner, A. D., Manka, S. W., Wang, S., Moores, C. A. & Atherton, J. A microtubule RELION-based pipeline for cryo-EM picture processing. J. Struct. Biol. 209, 107402 (2020).
Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New instruments for automated cryo-EM single-particle evaluation in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).
Kon, T. et al. The two.8 Å crystal construction of the dynein motor area. Nature 484, 345–350 (2012).
DeSantis, M. E. et al. Lis1 has two opposing modes of regulating cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 170, 1197–1208.e12 (2017).
Qiu, R., Zhang, J., Rotty, J. D. & Xiang, X. Dynein activation in vivo is regulated by the nucleotide states of its AAA3 area. Curr. Biol. 31, 4486–4498.e6 (2021).
Schroeder, C. M., Ostrem, J. M. L., Hertz, N. T. & Vale, R. D. A Ras-like area within the mild intermediate chain bridges the dynein motor to a cargo-binding area. eLife 3, e03351 (2014).
Carter, A. P. Crystal clear insights into how the dynein motor strikes. J. Cell Sci. 126, 705–713 (2013).
Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM constructions utilizing neural networks. Nat. Strategies 18, 176–185 (2021).
d’Amico, E. et al. Conformational transitions of the mitotic adaptor Spindly underlie its interplay with dynein and dynactin. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.02.478874 (2022).
Evans, R. et al. Protein complicated prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2021).
Chai, P., Rao, Q. & Zhang, Ok. Multi-curve becoming and tubulin-lattice sign elimination for construction dedication of enormous microtubule-based motors. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.22.477366 (2022).
Shibata, Ok. et al. A single protofilament is adequate to help unidirectional strolling of dynein and kinesin. PLoS ONE 7, e42990 (2012).
Schroeder, C. M. & Vale, R. D. Meeting and activation of dynein–dynactin by the cargo adaptor protein Hook3. J. Cell Biol. 214, 309–318 (2016).
Schlager, M. A. et al. Pericentrosomal concentrating on of Rab6 secretory vesicles by bicaudal-D-related protein 1 (BICDR-1) regulates neuritogenesis. EMBO J. 29, 1637–1651 (2010).
Bielska, E. et al. Hook is an adapter that coordinates kinesin-3 and dynein cargo attachment on early endosomes. J. Cell Biol. 204, 989–1007 (2014).
McClintock, M. A. et al. RNA-directed activation of cytoplasmic dynein-1 in reconstituted transport RNPs. eLife 7, e36312 (2018).
Hancock, W. O. Bidirectional cargo transport: shifting past tug of conflict. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 615–628 (2014).
Fu, M. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Built-in regulation of motor-driven organelle transport by scaffolding proteins. Tendencies Cell Biol. 24, 564–574 (2014).
Fenton, A. R., Jongens, T. A. & Holzbaur, E. L. F. Mitochondrial adaptor TRAK2 prompts and functionally hyperlinks opposing kinesin and dynein motors. Nat. Commun. 12, 4578 (2021).
Canty, J. T., Hensley, A. & Yildiz, A. TRAK adaptors coordinate the recruitment and activation of dynein and kinesin to regulate mitochondrial transport. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.454553 (2021).
Rai, A. et al. Dynein clusters into lipid microdomains on phagosomes to drive fast transport towards lysosomes. Cell 164, 722–734 (2016).
Belyy, V. et al. The mammalian dynein–dynactin complicated is a robust opponent to kinesin in a tug-of-war competitors. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1018–1024 (2016).
Zhang, Ok. et al. Cryo-EM reveals how human cytoplasmic dynein is auto-inhibited and activated. Cell 169, 1303–1314.e18 (2017).
Kapust, R. B. et al. Tobacco etch virus protease: mechanism of autolysis and rational design of secure mutants with wild-type catalytic proficiency. Protein Eng. 14, 993–1000 (2001).
Pierson, G. B., Burton, P. R. & Himes, R. H. Alterations in variety of protofilaments in microtubules assembled in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 76, 223–228 (1978).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced movement for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Strategies 14, 331–332 (2017).
Zivanov, J. et al. New instruments for automated high-resolution cryo-EM construction dedication in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: quick and correct defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Wagner, T. et al. Two particle-picking procedures for filamentous proteins: SPHIRE-crYOLO filament mode and SPHIRE-STRIPER. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 76, 613–620 (2020).
Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a quick and correct absolutely automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 218 (2019).
Warshamanage, R., Yamashita, Ok. & Murshudov, G. N. EMDA: a Python package deal for electron microscopy knowledge evaluation. J. Struct. Biol. 214, 107826 (2021).
Kellogg, E. H. et al. Insights into the distinct mechanisms of motion of taxane and non-taxane microtubule stabilizers from cryo-EM constructions. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 633–646 (2017).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory analysis and evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Redwine, W. B. et al. Structural foundation for microtubule binding and launch by dynein. Science 337, 1532–1536 (2012).
Lacey, S. E., He, S., Scheres, S. H. & Carter, A. P. Cryo-EM of dynein microtubule-binding domains exhibits how an axonemal dynein distorts the microtubule. eLife 8, e47145 (2019).
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: assembly fashionable challenges in visualization and evaluation. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, Ok. Options and improvement of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Actual-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Strategies 19, 679–682 (2022).
Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 desktop and native net server app for quick, interactive sequence searches. Bioinformatics 35, 2856–2858 (2019).
Jumper, J. et al. Extremely correct protein construction prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Hornak, V. et al. Comparability of a number of Amber drive fields and improvement of improved protein spine parameters. Proteins 65, 712–725 (2006).
Suzuki, Y., Shimizu, T., Morii, H. & Tanokura, M. Hydrolysis of AMPPNP by the motor area of ncd, a kinesin-related protein. FEBS Lett. 409, 29–32 (1997).
Sievers, F. et al. Quick, scalable technology of high-quality protein a number of sequence alignments utilizing Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography utilizing sturdy prediction of specimen actions. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Pc visualization of three-dimensional picture knowledge utilizing IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Actual-time cryo-electron microscopy knowledge preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Strategies 16, 1146–1152 (2019).
Williams, J. C. et al. Structural and thermodynamic characterization of a cytoplasmic dynein mild chain–intermediate chain complicated. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10028–10033 (2007).
Schmidt, H., Gleave, E. S. & Carter, A. P. Insights into dynein motor area perform from a 3.3-Å crystal construction. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 492–497 (2012).
Vincent, T. L., Inexperienced, P. J. & Woolfson, D. N. LOGICOIL—multi-state prediction of coiled-coil oligomeric state. Bioinformatics 29, 69–76 (2013).