[ad_1]
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of bodily actuality be thought of full? Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964).
Bell, J. S. in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy 2nd edn, Ch. 24, 232–248 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).
Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to check native hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969).
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014).
Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation utilizing electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
Giustina, M. et al. Vital-loophole-free check of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).
Shalm, L. Okay. et al. Sturdy loophole-free check of native realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).
Li, M.-H. et al. Take a look at of native realism into the previous with out detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080404 (2018).
Rosenfeld, W. et al. Occasion-ready Bell check utilizing entangled atoms concurrently closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).
Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy utilizing a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).
Kurpiers, P. et al. Deterministic quantum state switch and distant entanglement utilizing microwave photons. Nature 558, 264–267 (2018).
Walter, T. et al. Speedy, high-fidelity, single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054020 (2017).
Magnard, P. et al. Microwave quantum hyperlink between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic methods. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020).
Scarani, V. Bell Nonlocality (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).
Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. F. Experimental check of native hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
Side, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: a brand new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
Larsson, J.-A. Loopholes in Bell inequality exams of native realism. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 424003 (2014).
Side, A., Dalibard, J. & Roger, G. Experimental check of Bell’s inequalities utilizing time- various analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804 (1982).
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Violation of Bell’s inequality beneath strict Einstein locality circumstances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with environment friendly detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001).
Side, A. Closing the door on Einstein and Bohr’s quantum debate. Physics 8, 123 (2015).
Acín, A. et al. System-independent safety of quantum cryptography towards collective assaults. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).
Šupić, I. & Bowles, J. Self-testing of quantum methods: a evaluation. Quantum 4, 337 (2020).
Sekatski, P., Bancal, J.-D., Wagner, S. & Sangouard, N. Certifying the constructing blocks of quantum computer systems from Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180505 (2018).
Vazirani, U. & Vidick, T. Totally device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014).
Colbeck, R. Quantum and Relativistic Protocols for Safe Multi-Social gathering Computation. PhD thesis, Univ. Cambridge (2009).
Pironio, S. et al. Random numbers licensed by Bell’s theorem. Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010).
Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. Free randomness may be amplified. Nat. Phys. 8, 450–453 (2012).
Kessler, M. & Arnon-Friedman, R. System-independent randomness amplification and privatization. IEEE J. Chosen Areas Inf. Idea 1, 568–584 (2020).
Krinner, S. et al. Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three floor code. Nature 605, 669–674 (2022).
Leggett, A. J. Macroscopic quantum methods and the quantum idea of measurement. Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 69, 80–100 (1980).
Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. Okay. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).
Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Vitality-level quantization within the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1543 (1985).
Ansmann, M. et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson section qubits. Nature 461, 504–506 (2009).
The BIG Bell Take a look at Collaboration. Difficult native realism with human decisions. Nature 557, 212–216 (2018).
Zhong, Y. P. et al. Violating Bell’s inequality with remotely related superconducting qubits. Nat. Phys. 15, 741–744 (2019).
Wootters, W. Okay. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P. & Horodecki, M. Violating Bell inequality by combined spin-12 states: mandatory and ample situation. Phys. Lett. A 200, 340 (1995).
Garg, A. & Mermin, N. D. Detector inefficiencies within the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831 (1987).
Eberhard, P. H. Background stage and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. A 47, R747 (1993).
Magnard, P. Meter-Scale Microwave Quantum Networks for Superconducting Circuits. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2021).
Axline, C. et al. On-demand quantum state switch and entanglement between distant microwave cavity recollections. Nat. Phys. 14, 705–710 (2018).
Campagne-Ibarcq, P. et al. Deterministic distant entanglement of superconducting circuits via microwave two-photon transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200501 (2018).
Kurpiers, P., Walter, T., Magnard, P., Salathe, Y. & Wallraff, A. Characterizing the attenuation of coaxial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures. EPJ Quant. Technol. 4, 8 (2017).
D’Addabbo, A. et al. The CUORE cryostat. J. Low Temp. Phys. 193, 867–875 (2018).
Pechal, M. et al. Microwave-controlled technology of formed single photons in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. X 4, 041010 (2014).
Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V. & Mitchell, M. W. Era of recent and pure random numbers for loophole-free Bell exams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250403 (2015).
Burkhart, L. D. et al. Error-detected state switch and entanglement in a superconducting quantum community. PRX Quantum 2, 030321 (2021).
Barrett, J., Hardy, L. & Kent, A. No signalling and quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005).
Peñas, G. F., Puebla, R., Ramos, T., Rabl, P. & García-Ripoll, J. J. Common deterministic quantum operations in microwave quantum hyperlinks. Phys. Rev. Utilized 17, 054038 (2022).
Kjaergaard, M. et al. Superconducting qubits: present state of play. Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369–395 (2020).
Josephson, B. D. Doable new results in superconductive tunnelling. Phys. Lett. 1, 251–253 (1962).
Koch, J. et al. Cost-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair field. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).
DiCarlo, L. et al. Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature 460, 240–244 (2009).
Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state switch and entanglement distribution amongst distant nodes in a quantum community. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
Scheidl, T. et al. Violation of native realism with freedom of alternative. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19708 (2010).
Zhang, Y., Glancy, S. & Knill, E. Asymptotically optimum information evaluation for rejecting native realism. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062118 (2011).
[ad_2]
