[ad_1]
Might 20, 2020
It has grow to be modern in traditionalist circles responsible all
issues in trendy theology on the so-called nouvelle
théologie, together with a variety of thinkers akin to
Henri de Lubac, Karl Rahner, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Küng and
Josef Ratzinger. However that is primarily based on numerous misconceptions:
in regards to the nature of the nouvelle théologie
itself, and in regards to the views held by a few of these theologians.
Nouvelle théologie is just not a unified motion
during which everybody held the identical views. Among the “new
theologians” have been radicals and modernists who needed the Church to
bow to the fashionable world. Some have been orthodox males who needed to
revitalize theology by a return to the sources: the Fathers,
Scripture, and St. Thomas (in his personal phrases, not as filtered
by means of the commentators). Others have been more durable to pin down.
A broad-brush strategy to the nouvelle
théologie has resulted in injustices, maybe as a lot
to theology itself as to some good Churchmen whose reputations have
been tarnished. Even Ratzinger has been dubbed a modernist by a
sure trigger-happy trad movie star. It’s time for an
intervention, and theologian Richard DeClue is right here to deliver some
sobriety.
Hyperlinks
DeClue’s Views https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq3P-y0YV1V6owHdCRw4I3A
Richard DeClue’s weblog, Sapientia Nulliformis
https://declubac.wixsite.com/sapientianulliformis
Episode 38: The Sacred Monster, on Garrigou-Lagrange
https://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/episode-38-sacred-monster-matthew-k-minerd/
This podcast is a manufacturing of CatholicCulture.org. In case you like
the present, please contemplate supporting us! http://catholicculture.org/donate/audio
[ad_2]
