Jamie Spears says the decide acquired it unsuitable … Britney ought to have to sit down for a deposition and reply to all the allegations she’s made about him and her time within the conservatorship.
In response to authorized docs, filed within the California Courtroom of Appeals and obtained by TMZ, Jamie says it is unfair the court docket dominated he needed to sit for a deposition whereas Britney can get away with out having to sit down for one. The docs state, “The suitable to take a deposition can hardly ever be denied. In California, discovery is a matter of proper.”
Jamie’s authorized group additionally argues Britney and her lawyer, Mathew Rosengart, didn’t set up good trigger to justify prohibiting her deposition … particularly given the actual fact she made numerous claims in opposition to Jamie for wrongdoing.
Jamie says if the court docket had a problem with Britney’s deposition, it may have restricted the matters or questions coated … however as a substitute, it simply shut her deposition down altogether.
Jamie’s authorized group says the one-sidedness within the trial decide’s ruling violates primary equity … that if one social gathering has to sit down for a depo, the opposite social gathering ought to as nicely.
The trial decide dominated no matter Jamie needed from Britney could possibly be obtained by writing. His authorized group clearly feels that would apply to him as nicely, and now they’re gunning for equal therapy — he sits for a depo, then she ought to as nicely.